ShareThis Page
Scandalizing America II |

Scandalizing America II

| Friday, May 31, 2013 8:57 p.m.

Regarding the House Committee on Oversight and Government Reform’s May 22 hearing on the IRS scandal: In excessively lengthy periods of time, it appeared that Lois Lerner, who directs the IRS division that oversees tax-exempt organizations, was attempting to evade her obvious bias in rejecting applications from tea party groups and like organizations, but especially those of religious groups.

It seems she greatly desired to invoke the Fifth Amendment just one time as her own “blanket exemption” before a desired rapid escape down the rat hole.

Sorry, Ms. Lerner, you should be compelled to stand (or sit, if you prefer) and repeat to each and every question, “I decline to answer …” while taking the Fifth.

You rejected and gave “no quarter” to those who rightly deserved consideration. Live by the sword …

Robert Engel

Baldwin Borough

TribLIVE commenting policy

You are solely responsible for your comments and by using you agree to our Terms of Service.

We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.

While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.

We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers

We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.

We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.

We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.

We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.