Scare tactics & Ebola |

Scare tactics & Ebola

On Oct. 28, President Obama blasted New York and New Jersey for their Ebola quarantine protocols, declaring that “America is not defined by fear.” There was a time, before the era of big government, when that statement was undeniably true.

Unfortunately, the federal government has so often resorted to fear mongering as a means of justifying bloated programs and erosion of our liberties that it has created the culture of fear that the president now decries.

The federal government predicted that if we didn’t invade Iraq, weapons of mass destruction would be deployed against American interests. If we didn’t bail out General Motors, the U.S. auto industry would cease to exist. If we didn’t spend trillions in stimulus funds, the economy would collapse.

If we didn’t pass ObamaCare, citizens would die in the streets for lack of health care. If we don’t allow the NSA to read our email, terrorists will succeed in destroying U.S. targets. If we don’t regulate coal-fired power plants out of existence, the oceans will rise and swallow up Miami.

Now, faced with the Ebola epidemic, which is every bit as terrifying to the average American as the bankruptcy of GM, we are reassured that there is no need to panic. Suddenly, fear is no longer in vogue.

I happen to believe the medical experts, that the chance of contracting Ebola in the U.S. is extremely low.

But I find it reprehensible that the federal government can now, after decades of fostering a culture of fear, admonish its citizens and state government officials for being afraid.

John M. Haschak

Richland Township

Cambria County

TribLIVE commenting policy

You are solely responsible for your comments and by using you agree to our Terms of Service.

We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.

While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.

We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers

We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.

We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.

We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.

We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.