School board drops N. Side plan |

School board drops N. Side plan

The Pittsburgh school board Tuesday night voted down a proposal to buy 16.5 acres of property on the North Side.

School district officials wanted the land, located at Evergreen Road and Ivory Avenue near Reserve Township, for a new stadium, career high school or teacher training center. The site has room for two of those projects.

The board voted 8-0 against buying the land, with Mark Brentley Sr. abstaining. Board members had said they did not have enough time to discuss a new stadium or career high school, which would replace South Vo-Tech High School on the South Side.

The property is owned by the Wilmar Group, a North Hills developer. The board had wanted to postpone a vote, but under the terms of a preliminary sales agreement, the district needed to give Wilmar a definite answer. The agreement called for the district to pay $3.6 million.

The district may still pursue a deal with the J. Allan Steel Co. to buy nearly four acres on Beaver Avenue near Manchester for the career high school. The district would have to demolish a scrap yard and mill that are on the property.

In other matters, the board approved a 4.26 percent pay hike for principals and district administrators, including Deputy Superintendent Paula Butterfield and Chief of Staff Philip Parr. Butterfield now will earn $123,448 annually, and Parr will be paid $101,979.

TribLIVE commenting policy

You are solely responsible for your comments and by using you agree to our Terms of Service.

We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.

While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.

We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers

We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.

We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.

We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.

We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.