School board keeps residents in the dark |

School board keeps residents in the dark

I would like to comment on the on-going negotiations between the Deer Lakes School Board and the teachers’ union. My husband and I have been a part of this community for nine years and we have two children in the district. As parents we have a vested interest in these negotiations. We have gotten involved at the last two board meetings by asking questions and have been met by much resistance by the board to discuss the situation. As taxpayers and parents we have the right to know where the board stands.

The teachers have made their position clear by doing informational picketing, to the dismay of many parents. But how else are we to know• And what about our children• They are left to wonder with the rest of us whether or not they will be in school next week.

We are fortunate enough to have some very fine teachers in this district and the board needs to wake up before we start losing them. I would not blame them one bit if they were using their sick time to look for jobs elsewhere. I stand by the teachers at this point because the board has given us nothing to go on.

At last Monday’s board meeting Ray Sekula, district solicitor, made it perfectly clear that there would be no comments made on the negotiations and the board’s position at this time. Many angry parents spoke out and asked questions that he blatantly refused to answer. The board maintains that they want to avoid a strike as much as the parents and the teachers. But what about Mr. Sekula• His interests lie in his wallet. If they settle, he is out of a paycheck. This contract has been in negotiations for one year with no resolution in sight, and in that time Mr. Sekula has banked about $13,200 of our money. Obviously, he is in no hurry at $90 per hour with a $500 retainer.

I urge Superintendent King and the board to get rid of Mr. Sekula and negotiate this contract on your own. After all, Superintendent Carr was able to do it without Mr. Sekula’s “expertise” and, lo and behold, no strike.

Anita Ventura, West Deer

TribLIVE commenting policy

You are solely responsible for your comments and by using you agree to our Terms of Service.

We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.

While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.

We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers

We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.

We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.

We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.

We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.