ShareThis Page
School districts press court to begin Washington County reassessments |

School districts press court to begin Washington County reassessments

Jeremy Boren
| Thursday, January 5, 2012 12:00 a.m

Washington County should begin a court-ordered property reassessment despite a lingering legal appeal aimed at preventing it, an attorney representing two school districts said in court papers on Wednesday.

Washington County commissioners appealed to Commonwealth Court to overturn a lower court’s Nov. 15 order to begin the reassessment process. The appeal automatically delays the lower court’s order from taking effect while Commonwealth Court considers it.

Susan Mondik Key, the attorney representing McGuffey and Washington school districts, asked President Judge Debbie O’Dell Seneca of Washington County to lift the automatic delay so the reassessment can proceed.

The school districts sued the county in 2008 to force it to comply with an agreement to update property values. School districts rely heavily upon property taxes to generate revenue. Washington County last reassessed property in 1981.

County commissioners have fought a reassessment. They contend that paying $8 million to perform it is too expensive because the values could become obsolete in a few years. Commissioners have sought to delay a reassessment in hopes that the state Legislature would create uniform, statewide rules, but that hasn’t happened.

Washington County officials have said they would contract with Dallas-based Tyler Technologies to perform the reassessment. Tyler is handling the $11 million reassessment in Allegheny County. Homeowners in Pittsburgh and Mt. Oliver have flooded phone lines with complaints and appeal requests since receiving their reassessment notices last week.

Categories: News
TribLIVE commenting policy

You are solely responsible for your comments and by using you agree to our Terms of Service.

We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.

While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.

We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers

We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.

We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.

We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.

We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.