ShareThis Page
School lunches go up |

School lunches go up

| Tuesday, July 6, 2004 12:00 a.m

FORD CITY — School children will get an economics lesson next year, but not in the classroom.

They’ll learn about supply and demand in the cafeteria.

The price of a school lunch will increase next year, going from $1.50 for an elementary school lunch to $1.60 and from $1.75 to $1.80 for high school students.

The reason for the increase is due to higher milk prices and the increased price of fuel, according to LuAnn Fee, food services director for the Armstrong School District.

“Just for milk alone it’s going to cost $50,000 more (than last school year),” she said. “I need at least $100,000 to balance the budget.”

Fee said food suppliers raised prices because of higher costs associated with transporting it to the district.

The increase in the cost of milk was more acute though, she said.

“This is the first time since I’ve started that I’ve seen milk increase like that,” Fee said.

Normally, school lunch price increases are due to higher labor costs, she said.

Roughly 70 percent of all students in the district buy lunches at the school, rather than pack their own, according to Fee.

Even with the price increase, she said a school lunch is still a better value than a packed lunch.

“Every once in awhile we price out a bag lunch to see what it costs,” she said.

“A whole school lunch is still cheaper than a bag of potato chips.”

Categories: News
TribLIVE commenting policy

You are solely responsible for your comments and by using you agree to our Terms of Service.

We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.

While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.

We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers

We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.

We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.

We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.

We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.