Archive

Scott Wagner swings for reform (if not higher office) | TribLIVE.com
News

Scott Wagner swings for reform (if not higher office)

HARRISBURG

Take a baseball bat, a dose of Donald Trump and a healthy disdain for Gov. Tom Wolf and you have Scott Wagner, the independently wealthy Republican businessman who's setting a new tone in the Pennsylvania Senate.

He's brash. He's blunt. And he pulls no punches. Wagner has Trump's populist streak. He might one day tap the same type of voter anger in a governor's race that Trump has in the GOP presidential primaries. Republican insiders say there's little doubt Wagner is running for governor in 2018.

The baseball bat is almost legendary. On his way into the Senate in 2014, Wagner threatened to use one to straighten out Senate GOP leadership. Sans a Louisville Slugger, he helped push out a liberal GOP leader. He's openly called out RINOs (Republicans In Name Only.) He grills witnesses at Senate hearings. He doesn't tolerate non-answers.

To his critics, Wagner is a union-hating, right-wing ideologue and bully. At a Press Club luncheon in June, he didn't deny being part bully and he thinks public-sector unions are a huge part of the problem. He is conservative but not an ideologue. Everything is approached from a business standpoint. Wagner flies around the state in a helicopter he pilots.

Teachers' benefits are high on his list of state problems, particularly those of Philadelphia teachers, whom he says pay nothing toward their own health care. He used his own resources to arrange a loan to a financially strapped charter school in his Senate district.

The comparison to Trump comes from using his personal wealth to fund candidates and, obviously, his business acumen. Not many freshmen senators get to run the Senate Republican Campaign Committee. He's already a power in the caucus.

“I'm just a garbage man without a college degree,” Wagner once stated. Right. One who bought one truck, then another and now owns Penn Waste. He owns multiple companies. He's said on several occasions, “I don't need this (senator's) job.” And he doesn't.

Wagner has shown up at the meetings of committees of which he's not a member and taken notes. He sat down in the reporters' seats at a news conference and asked a question. He sends out long missives via email to an e-list, railing about Wolf and state spending.

I sat down with Wagner recently as the appropriations committees looked into Wolf's use of money in prior-year accounts for billions that he spent during a six-month budget impasse. Wagner brings up how Auditor General Eugene DePasquale's audit of Pittsburgh Public Schools in December found a $129 million surplus, despite claims of heading toward insolvency.

Wagner is concerned that a multitude of state accounts might be holding cash from past years. Before a cent of money is raised in taxes, as Wolf proposes, every dime must be accounted for, Wagner said.

“This is big,” he says. “It's like an octopus on steroids.”

The real irony is that Wolf, a liberal Democrat and businessman, and Wagner both hail from York County. Is there something in the water there causing this phenomenon?

Brad Bumsted is Trib Total Media's state Capitol reporter (717-787-1405 or [email protected]).


TribLIVE commenting policy

You are solely responsible for your comments and by using TribLive.com you agree to our Terms of Service.

We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.

While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.

We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers

We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.

We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.

We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.

We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.