ShareThis Page
Seal resigns from New Eagle council |

Seal resigns from New Eagle council

| Friday, November 9, 2001 12:00 a.m

New Eagle councilman Walter Seal gave three months notice of his intent to resign his position, without addressing accusations that he no longer lives in the borough.

In a letter he read to council, Seal said he would resign effective Jan. 31, 2002.

“I have given this much thought,” sad Seal. “I am doing this of my own free will.”

Seal said after the meeting that he would resign after taking the oath of office for the four year term that voters elected him to in Tuesday’s General Election. That will allow his replacement to serve a full term, rather than the final months of his existing term.

“I plan to stay active in the political arena,” said Seal.

Seal said he was resigning for “personal reasons.”

Seal’s resignation came after a lengthy executive session held for “potential litigation,” according to borough solicitor Mark Mascara.

Council’s held an executive session at its October meeting to admittedly speak about Seal’s residency. At that session, Seal’s peers accused him of having moved out of New Eagle.

The issue was never directly discussed by any borough official Thursday, however.

Seal abstained from all votes last night and pledged to do the same in December and January.

Council president Lacey Sweeney was out of town on business, but participated in last night’s meeting by telephone.

Sweeney made the motion to accept Seal’s resignation.

Categories: News
TribLIVE commenting policy

You are solely responsible for your comments and by using you agree to our Terms of Service.

We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.

While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.

We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers

We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.

We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.

We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.

We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.