Seat-belt check leads to auto chase, arrest |

Seat-belt check leads to auto chase, arrest

A weekend campaign to crack down on seat-belt violations led to a chase through several Pittsburgh neighborhoods.

About 11:30 p.m. Monday, officers tried to pull over a car driven by Germaine Alford, 25, of Penn Hills, after he drove through a red light on East Ohio Street in the North Side, police said.

Alford drove off and got on Route 28 north, and led officers over the Highland Park Bridge, police said, adding that he then drove into oncoming traffic and through a barricade police had set up at the intersection of Butler Street and One Wild Place.

One officer had to dive into bushes by the side of the road to avoid being struck by Alford’s car, police said.

Police said they continued the chase until Alford abandoned his car in the 5000 block of Rosetta Street in Garfield, then ran between several houses on Brown Way, where officers caught him.

Alford is charged with aggravated assault, fleeing and eluding police and a string of traffic violations, including a seat-belt violation. Alford also was wanted by the U.S. Marshals’ office, police said, but the charge was not known Tuesday.

TribLIVE commenting policy

You are solely responsible for your comments and by using you agree to our Terms of Service.

We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.

While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.

We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers

We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.

We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.

We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.

We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.