SEC launches formal investigation of Taser |

SEC launches formal investigation of Taser

The Associated Press

PHOENIX — The Securities and Exchange Commission inquiry into stun-gun maker Taser International Inc. is now a formal investigation with an expanded scope, the company said Tuesday.

Shares tumbled 12 percent after the announcement.

The company had previously said the SEC was looking into claims Taser has made about safety studies for its stun guns and also has been looking into a $1.5 million, end-of-year sale of stun guns to a firearms distributor in Prescott. Some stock analysts have questioned the deal because it appeared to inflate sales to meet annual projections.

The formal probe is now also examining the possibility that outsiders acquired internal company information to manipulate the stock price, Taser said in a news release.

A formal investigation gives the SEC subpoena power to obtain documents and testimony.

“We recognize that this has been a difficult process for our employees and shareholders,” Taser’s chief executive, Rick Smith, said in the release. “We continue to make all efforts to assist the SEC in completing their investigation as expeditiously as possible.”

Taser said it’s cooperating with the investigation The company declined to say when the inquiry became formal, whether any Taser employees have been subpoenaed and, if so, what information any subpoenas sought.

An SEC spokesman said that as a matter of SEC policy, the agency would neither confirm nor deny any investigation.

Taser began marketing police stun guns in 1998 as a way to subdue combative people in high-risk situations. Now, more than 7,300 law enforcement agencies and military installations use them worldwide.

But critics say the stun guns have been used too liberally by police and have contributed to scores of deaths. Amnesty International has compiled a list of more than 100 people the group says have died after being shocked in scuffles with lawmen.

A letter published in the New England Journal of Medicine earlier this month suggested that officers who deploy Tasers also should consider carrying heart defibrillators. The letter was authored by two doctors at Children’s Memorial Hospital in Chicago who documented a known case of ventricular fibrillation — a potentially fatal heart arrhythmia — in a teenager who was shocked with a Taser.

Shares of Taser fell 96 cents, or 13 percent, to close at $6.35 yesterday on the Nasdaq Stock Market, slipping below its 52-week range of $7.11 to $33.45.

TribLIVE commenting policy

You are solely responsible for your comments and by using you agree to our Terms of Service.

We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.

While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.

We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers

We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.

We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.

We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.

We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.