ShareThis Page
Second-rate sarcasm II |

Second-rate sarcasm II

| Sunday, August 26, 2007 12:00 a.m

I found Eric Heyl’s smarmy attitude out of line with the usually well-written, classy and intelligent offerings of the Trib. If Mr. Heyl disagrees with hunting, he should openly say so in a gentlemanly way, not in the specious use of hyperbole. I’m sure Heyl would scream if any government authority should “suspend” the use of his “right” to use certain words until it “updated” the dictionary.

Heyl assumes (a bad habit for a supposed “journalist”) that hunters are the only ones to be affected by the ill-conceived, poorly scheduled shutdown of the system. He shows no concern for a senior citizen such as myself, or a single mother et al., to defend themselves should an unscheduled need arise.

His derision of hunters and hunting flies in the face of the fact that hunters are the biggest financial supporters of wildlife and sanctuaries with their taxes, license fees and other support efforts.

Should Heyl prefer to write a satire or humor column, I’m sure the Trib could find a place for him — and label it as such.

Harry R. Wess Sr.


Categories: News
TribLIVE commenting policy

You are solely responsible for your comments and by using you agree to our Terms of Service.

We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.

While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.

We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers

We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.

We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.

We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.

We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.