ShareThis Page
Secret Service deputy out |

Secret Service deputy out

| Monday, February 9, 2015 9:03 p.m

WASHINGTON — The Secret Service said Monday that it was removing its second-ranking official, forcing out one of the last remaining senior managers who had presided over a string of embarrassing security lapses in recent years.

The ouster of Deputy Director Alvin “A.T.” Smith, spurred by lawmakers who have called for fresh leadership at the troubled agency, occurred three days before he was scheduled to testify before a House panel.

Smith, who oversaw the Secret Service’s day-to-day operations for the past three years, was expected to be grilled about key decisions he made regarding spending cuts and officer training — issues that have been cited as contributing factors for recent security mistakes.

The chairman and ranking Democrat of the House Oversight and Government Reform Committee, Republican Jason Chaffetz of Utah and Democrat Elijah Cummings of Maryland, shared with White House officials their strong preference that Smith, 56, should not remain in the job, according to people briefed on the discussions.

Chaffetz and Cummings applauded his departure in a joint statement, saying that they had met with administration officials and “expressed our shared conviction that the Secret Service needs to turn the page with respect to its senior leadership.”

Smith has been invited to transfer to another position within the Department of Homeland Security, according to an email sent to Secret Service staff that praised Smith’s 29 years of service to the agency.

Shake-ups cost Director Julia Pierson her job last fall and led to the forced removal and retirements of most of the agency’s senior management.

Categories: News
TribLIVE commenting policy

You are solely responsible for your comments and by using you agree to our Terms of Service.

We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.

While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.

We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers

We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.

We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.

We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.

We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.