Sen. Toomey bill would allow veterans to sue VA employees |

Sen. Toomey bill would allow veterans to sue VA employees

James Knox | Tribune-Review
U.S. Sen. Pat Toomey, R-Lehigh County, speaks with Pittsburgh Tribune-Review editors and reporters on Friday, March 14, 2014.

Federal workers who falsify or deliberately omit key details of veterans’ health records could face personal legal action under a bill expected Tuesday by Sen. Pat Toomey, R-Lehigh Valley. The VA Accountability Act would ban workers in the Department of Veterans Affairs from manipulating or intentionally withholding a veteran’s health information from the affected patient. The bill also would make it illegal for VA workers to withhold health records with the intention of misleading federal officials or Congress. Workers who break the rule could be sued directly by the affected veterans, according to the bill. Toomey was not immediately available for comment. He planned to announce the bill Tuesday morning in southeastern Pennsylvania, an aide said.

The announcement comes as the VA falls under growing scrutiny in Phoenix, where published reports suggest 40 veterans died while waiting for VA health care. Federal investigators there are reviewing allegations of a secret waiting list. A congressional hearing in Pittsburgh last September centered on alleged malpractice at several other VA systems, including the VA Pittsburgh Healthcare System in Oakland and O’Hara. At least six veterans died and 16 others were sickened in a Legionnaires’ disease outbreak in 2011 and 2012 at the Pittsburgh VA. Relatives of some victims believe their loved ones’ VA medical records were left incomplete.

TribLIVE commenting policy

You are solely responsible for your comments and by using you agree to our Terms of Service.

We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.

While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.

We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers

We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.

We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.

We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.

We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.