Senate panel votes to curb trades of derivatives |

Senate panel votes to curb trades of derivatives

WASHINGTON — The Senate Agriculture Committee on Wednesday approved by 13-8 tough new curbs on financial derivatives, including a ban on most direct bank trading of the tools, which played a big role in exacerbating the 2008 financial crisis.

Derivatives are financial bets between private parties. Their value is derived from movements of an underlying asset. Some derivatives, such as oil futures contracts, are regulated and trade on an exchange.

Congress is trying to address the over-the-counter products that are often called swaps because one party wants to swap a risk it’s assumed to another party that’s willing to shoulder that risk for a fixed price. Swap deals cover everything from movements in the prices of contracts for delivery of barrels of oil or bushels of wheat to changes in the value of the dollar versus other currencies. These swaps take place off regulated exchanges.

The ban would require banks to spin off divisions that trade in the lucrative but opaque financial instruments into free-standing subsidiaries.

The vote sent a strong signal that not only are Democrats eager to take bold steps to revamp the regulatory process, but that Congress may enact a broad overhaul of Wall Street practices.

Sen. Charles Grassley, R-Iowa, joined 12 Democrats in approving the new limits, the first time this year that a Republican senator has sided with the opposition on sweeping financial legislation. Grassley said he voted for the measure because “transparency is the right policy,” though he warned that he might vote against the final bill.

Other Republican senators talked in conciliatory terms, an indication that they’re feeling trapped between constituents demanding action against Wall Street excesses and their financial industry donors.

President Obama will give the effort a push today, when he travels to New York to call for tougher regulation of derivatives. The speech, White House press secretary Robert Gibbs said, will strike a balance between “calling out obscene bonuses” and “also saying that we don’t want to overly or unduly burden private enterprise and American business from operating.”

The derivatives vote was the final, and probably the most difficult, hurdle for the bill before it reaches the full Senate, perhaps as soon as today. The derivatives curbs, which would be tougher on banks than those the House passed last year, are expected to be added to broader legislation from the Senate Banking Committee that would change how financial institutions are regulated.

“Wall Street’s interests are different from Main Street’s. … Wall Street’s interest is to keep inefficient markets. This (legislation) is about promoting efficient markets,” said Commodity Futures Trading Commission Chairman Gary Gensler, who worked at Wall Street financial giant Goldman Sachs for 18 years.

TribLIVE commenting policy

You are solely responsible for your comments and by using you agree to our Terms of Service.

We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.

While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.

We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers

We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.

We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.

We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.

We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.