Senators grill Obama’s nominee over data breach |

Senators grill Obama’s nominee over data breach

The Associated Press

WASHINGTON — President Obama’s nominee to head the Office of Personnel Management on Thursday promised to strengthen the agency’s cybersecurity and information technology systems after what’s believed to be the largest data breach in U.S. history.

Senators grilled Beth Cobert at her confirmation hearing about the hack. She was nominated to succeed Katherine Archuleta, who resigned in July after hackers stole the Social Security numbers, health histories and other highly sensitive data belonging to more than 20 million people.

Cobert is the agency’s acting director.

“Clearly, existing protections are not sufficient and major changes are necessary, not just at the OPM but across the federal government,” said Wisconsin Sen. Ron Johnson, the Republican chairman of the Senate Homeland Security and Government Affairs Committee.

Johnson and other senators said federal employees who dedicate their careers to public service should be confident that the government will protect their most sensitive data.

In her testimony, she said the agency has put several safeguards in place since she became acting director.

“We need to change the way we act in the face of this threat,” she said.

The Obama administration is working to overhaul the federal security clearance system in response to the breach. Officials believe a Chinese espionage operation infiltrated the personnel office’s records, accessing information on 21.5 million current and former employment or job applicants. Fingerprint images belonging to about 5.6 million people were stolen.

A new government office, called the National Background Investigations Bureau, will take over the job of running background checks on all federal employees, contractors and others. And the Defense Department will design, build and operate the computer system that houses and processes people’s personal information.

Across the Capitol, a House panel is subpoenaing Cobert over documents related to the data breach. House Oversight and Government Reform Committee Chairman Jason Chaffetz, R-Utah, said Cobert is “not working in good faith with the committee” as Republicans investigate the data hack.

Separately, Louisiana Republican Sen. David Vitter has threatened to hold up Cobert’s nomination over issues related to the health care law. He has objected to Obama administration rules dealing with coverage for members of Congress and staffers.

Cobert is one of several Obama administration nominees who senators are holding up in the president’s final year in office.

TribLIVE commenting policy

You are solely responsible for your comments and by using you agree to our Terms of Service.

We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.

While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.

We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers

We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.

We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.

We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.

We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.