ShareThis Page
Senior citizens rally for expanded prescription drug coverage |

Senior citizens rally for expanded prescription drug coverage

The Associated Press
| Wednesday, September 17, 2003 12:00 a.m

HARRISBURG (AP) — Supporters of a plan to expand Pennsylvania’s prescription drug programs for the elderly rallied in the Capitol Rotunda on Tuesday in the hopes of spurring the state Senate to vote on the bill.

The measure, which was passed unanimously by the House in June, represents the Legislature’s effort to carry out Gov. Ed Rendell’s proposal to increase income eligibility limits for the Pharmaceutical Assistance Contract for the Elderly programs, commonly known as PACE and PACENET.

The legislation has been stalled in the Senate because Republican Leader David J. Brightbill of Lebanon County has said he wants to wait until Congress has resolved its debate over a complex Medicare prescription drug coverage bill.

Rendell said that although he expects the bill to be modified by the Senate, “the time to act is now.”

“Are you tired of waiting• Is there anybody here who’s worried that our life span may end before those guys in Washington act?” he said.

Ray Landis, legislative director for the state AARP, noted that during a Senate committee hearing on the bill last month, federal Medicare administrator Thomas Scully sought to allay concerns that Pennsylvania would risk losing federal funding if it expanded PACE and PACENET.

“We’re not going to be penalized for that,” Landis said.

The Senate Aging and Youth Committee has scheduled another hearing on the bill for Sept. 29.

Erik Arneson, an aide to Brightbill, said that while the senator would still prefer to wait for Congress to pass its legislation, he also wants to ensure that the expanded coverage is in place as of Jan. 1 — the date set by the House bill — regardless of what happens at the federal level.

Under the House bill, the income limits for participants in PACE, which has no deductible, would increase from $14,000 to $14,500 for individuals and from $17,200 to $17,700 for married couples.

The income limits for PACENET, a related program for seniors with higher incomes that kicks in after participants pay the first $500 of their drug costs each year, would change from $17,000 to $22,500 for individuals and from $20,200 to $30,500 for couples.

Additionally, the PACENET deductible would be changed from $500 annually to $40 per month.

Rendell has estimated that the new income levels would qualify an additional 300,000 seniors for PACE and PACENET benefits, although state officials expect only one-third of them to enroll.

The bill also would increase the co-payment amounts that PACE recipients must pay from $6 per prescription to $8 per prescription for name-brand drugs. PACENET participants have a higher co-payment, which would not change.

The increased co-payments are among several ways the state would cover the $320 million, five-year cost of Rendell’s plan. It would also be funded by increased state lottery revenue; larger rebates from drug manufacturers; and new restrictions on doctors and pharmacists.

Categories: News
TribLIVE commenting policy

You are solely responsible for your comments and by using you agree to our Terms of Service.

We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.

While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.

We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers

We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.

We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.

We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.

We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.