ShareThis Page
Sense about outsourcing |

Sense about outsourcing

| Friday, March 19, 2004 12:00 a.m

The outsourcing of jobs to foreign countries has dominated the political debate in recent months. Liberals are bemoaning a “jobless recovery” and John Kerry promises to address the “exporting of jobs.”

Amid this hysteria, Thomas Sowell’s article “How to make the economy worse” (March 17), was a breath of fresh air.

Sowell eloquently illustrated the danger of placing limitations on outsourcing: They would be reciprocated by other countries and damage the economy. A similar attempt to save jobs, using trade restrictions in the 1930’s, reduced foreign trade by two thirds and deepened the recession.

Common sense also cuts through this hysteria. The so-called “jobless recovery’ is a myth. The current 5.6 percent unemployment rate is lower than the unemployment rate in 21 of the last 30 years. We’ve also had several consecutive months of moderate job growth and GNP growth has been dramatic. Despite the naysayers, things are pretty good.

Secondly, baby boomers will begin to retire in large numbers before the end of the decade. At that time, a labor shortage is expected and we’ll need all the outsourcing we can get. John Kerry needs to stop demagoging this issue. “If it ain’t broke, don’t fix it.”

Ed Connor Sr.
Franklin Park

Categories: News
TribLIVE commenting policy

You are solely responsible for your comments and by using you agree to our Terms of Service.

We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.

While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.

We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers

We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.

We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.

We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.

We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.