ShareThis Page
Sept. 16: Scenes from the Arts-burgh |

Sept. 16: Scenes from the Arts-burgh

Mark Kanny
| Tuesday, September 16, 2008 12:00 a.m

Offerings from Pittsburgh’s cultural arts and entertainment events:

Musique on the Bluff

Three standing ovations marked the successful debut of Musique on the Bluff Sunday night at Duquesne University. The new two-year concert series is directed by pianist David Allen Wehr, who also presented two very successful series devoted to the piano sonatas of Ludwig van Beethoven and chamber music of Johannes Brahms.

Cesar Frank’s Violin Sonata set the tone for the evening. A triumphant blend of passion and masterly construction, it was forcefully presented by Wehr and violinist Charles Stegeman. However, the violinist’s inflections at the sublime start of the last movement were excessive and interrupted the smoothly harmonious give-and-take between instruments.

It was smart to include the piano version of Maurice Ravel’s “Le Tombeau de Couperin,” because it includes two rarely heard movements. Then, too, pianist Cynthia Raim delighted in Ravel’s imaginative treatment of baroque forms.

Finally, the verbal play of Ogden Nash’s narration for “The Carnival of the Animals” as delivered by the Rev. Sean P. Kealy highlighted the wittiness of Camille Saint-Saens’ score. Jeffrey Turner conducted a tasty performance of the original version for chamber ensemble. Cellist Anne Martindale Williams and bassist Micah Howard were among the outstanding soloists.

Duquesne University looks to have another hit on its hands with Musique on the Bluff.

Categories: News
TribLIVE commenting policy

You are solely responsible for your comments and by using you agree to our Terms of Service.

We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.

While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.

We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers

We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.

We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.

We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.

We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.