Archive

Serial rapist asks for longer sentence, gets 68 years | TribLIVE.com
News

Serial rapist asks for longer sentence, gets 68 years

The Associated Press

A man who raped 37 women over 16 years requested a longer sentence than recommended under a plea deal, and a judge accepted Wednesday, ordering him to 68 years in prison.

The judge was prepared to sentence Robert N. Patton Jr. to 50 years but increased the punishment after Patton said he does not deserve to leave prison. Patton, 42, apologized for 15 minutes to victims in the courtroom holding sprays of white roses before he was sentenced on 135 felony counts of rape, kidnapping and burglary.

Patton’s was arrested in June after a DNA sample that had sat in storage for 2.5 years was finally entered into a database. Afterward, he led police on a tour of Columbus-area homes where he broke in and raped women.

The sample had been taken in November 2001 while he served a sentence for burglary, theft and other violations, but federal funding to test convicted offenders’ samples ran out five weeks earlier. Thirteen women were attacked after the sample was collected but before it was catalogued in 2004.


TribLIVE commenting policy

You are solely responsible for your comments and by using TribLive.com you agree to our Terms of Service.

We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.

While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.

We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers

We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.

We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.

We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.

We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.