ShareThis Page
Serious sack time |

Serious sack time

| Saturday, September 24, 2005 12:00 a.m

Yough coach Jim Wehner is known as an offensive wiz.

But the Cougars’ new coach knows a little bit about defense, too.

Wehner and defensive coordinator Bill Schrecengost devised a defense to pressure the Uniontown quarterback. It worked like a charm.

Yough’s defense sacked Uniontown quarterbacks Steve Kezmarsky and Michael Dvorchak a combined eight times, and linebacker Cody Wilson returned an interception 45 yards for a touchdown, as Yough blitzed Uniontown, 22-14, in Friday night’s WPIAL Class AAA Keystone Conference battle for first place at Cougar Mountain.

“Turnovers, big plays and their defense were the difference,” Uniontown coach John Fortugna said. “We practiced all week picking it up. They just made the plays.”

Yough, which improved to 4-1 overall and 3-0 in the conference, started quickly. The Cougars scored touchdowns on their first two possessions and built a 14-0 lead in the first quarter.

Brad Janiro hauled in a 33-yard touchdown pass from quarterback Justin Shaffer on a fourth-and-16 to highlight a 10-play, 81-yard drive on the first possession. The Cougars also converted two third and long plays.

Shaffer connected with Craig Sedunov on a 41-yard pass, and then hit Janiro for 15 yards. Shaffer completed 8 of 15 passes for 148 yards.

On the second possession, Sedunov capped the second drive with a 34-yard gallop to cap a 5-play, 57-yard drive.

Yough extended its lead to 16-0 in the second quarter after Janiro pinned Uniontown back at its one with a 64-yard punt. On first down, Yough’s Jesse Lachimia and Shaffer tackled running back Greg Uphold for a safety.

“We told the players all week that if they came out and set the tone, we’d be OK,” Wehner said. “We relaxed late and it almost cost us.”

Uniontown, which turned the ball over three times, got on the scoreboard in the second quarter when Uphold caught a 6-yard pass from Steve Kezmarsky. The score trimmed the score to 16-6 at halftime.

Wilson’s interception return early in the third quarter pushed Yough’s lead to 22-6. Wilson finished with 93 yards on 18 carries.

After Wilson’s score, the Cougars’ defense took over the game. They allowed a touchdown in the fourth quarter.

Uniontown was held to a minus 35 yards rushing. Kezmarsky (10 of 19 for 128 yards) and Dvorchak (10-15-98) combined to complete 20 of 34 passes for 226 yards.

Dvorchak hit Uphold with a 4-yard scoring strike with 23.8 seconds left.

Uniontown did recover the on-sides kick at the Yough 41, but two unsportsmanlike penalties on the Uniontown bench pushed the Red Raiders back to their 30.

“When knew every play and he (Schrecengost) coached the heck out of the players,” Wehner said. “Craig knew where every play was going.”

Sedunov, who rushed for 51 yards, bruised his back after getting hit late on his touchdown run. He did electrify the large crowd in the third quarter with a nifty 88-yard touchdown run when he refused to be tackled. But the played was called back because of a holding penalty.

Yough was flagged 13 times for 125 yards.

“Coach said he was going to get me the ball, and (Friday) I did what I could,” Sedunov said. “This was a great win for us. It’s probably the most we’ve been up for a game all season.”

Yough will visit Belle Vernon on Thursday, in a game that will be televised on Fox Sports Pittsburgh. Uniontown returns home to play host to Mt. Pleasant on Friday.

Categories: News
TribLIVE commenting policy

You are solely responsible for your comments and by using you agree to our Terms of Service.

We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.

While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.

We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers

We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.

We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.

We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.

We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.