ShareThis Page
Sewer line trouble? A robot to the rescue |

Sewer line trouble? A robot to the rescue

| Wednesday, July 27, 2005 12:00 a.m

Right now, a robot could be crawling around under your house, making sure everything is OK with your sewer lines.

That mechanical friend — Responder is its name — will get a starring role on cable TV’s History Channel at 9 p.m. today and 7 p.m. Saturday.

“Responder can help people stay out of the areas we call the 3-D places — dirty, dark and dangerous,” says Eric Close, CEO of Homestead’s RedZone Robotics, makers of the 22-inch wide, 600-pound inspector.

The broadcast will be part of the History Channel’s “Modern Marvel” series and also will feature a human from the company, chief technology officer Scott Thayer, talking about how the project uses sensors and lasers to create imagery in an area Close calls “completely opaque.”

Close says Responder, a robot which has been under development for about 18 months, has been designed to examine areas that require constant maintenance and amount to about $5 billion a year in spending.

He calls the 600,000 miles of sewer lines in the nation “out most underappreciated form of infrastructure because nobody sees it.”

The robot can fit through a manhole and make its way along sewer lines, sending back information about blockages and calling attention to flawed spots in lines before they become breaks.

Through its efforts, the robot, which also can do cleaning, can help avert the need to dig up and disconnect pipes.

Categories: News
TribLIVE commenting policy

You are solely responsible for your comments and by using you agree to our Terms of Service.

We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.

While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.

We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers

We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.

We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.

We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.

We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.