Archive

ShareThis Page
Sexual harassment lawsuit filed against Armstrong County officials | TribLIVE.com
News

Sexual harassment lawsuit filed against Armstrong County officials

Tribune-Review
| Friday, May 8, 2015 8:21 p.m

An East Franklin woman has filed a civil suit against Armstrong County, its commissioners and emergency management officials alleging sexual harassment and discrimination.

Marci L. Creel, a longtime employee of the Armstrong County 911 Center, said in the suit that she was subjected to a “sexually hostile work environment” and harassed, demoted, and fired when she complained.

The lawsuit was filed Friday in U.S. District Court in Pittsburgh.

The suit says Creel suffered “severe humiliation, inconvenience, mental distress, embarrassment … as well as loss of income, fringe benefits, loss of reputation and loss of career opportunities.” Creel said 911 coworkers used sexually offensive language and references, watched pornographic videos and engaged in sexually suggestive conduct.

Named in the suit are 911 Coordinator Ronald Baustert, County Public Safety Director Randall Brozenick, Maryanne Koleny — at the time the county’s human resources director — and commissioners David Battaglia, Robert Bower and Richard Fink. The county is named in the suit.

On Sept. 20, 2012, Creel made a formal written complaint to commissioners, as well as Baustert, Brozenick and Kolney. Five days later, she was demoted from training coordinator to a dispatcher and quality assurance position, the lawsuit said.

In December 2012, she filed a discrimination charge with the U.S. Equal Employment Opportunity Commission, saying the defendants subjected her to a hostile work environment, failed to act on her complaints and demoted her in retaliation for her whistleblowing.

Creel said in the suit that Armstrong County 911 failed to provide her with working conditions that would accommodate a medical condition that affects her vision, while a fellow employee with the same condition received a special work station. Because of repeated requests for similar accommodations, co-workers made her: work in the dark during evening shift, kept information from her that she needed to do her job and wore dark glasses and made offensive comments about her disability, the suit alleges.

After Creel filed a second discrimination charge with the EEOC in 2013 about the county’s failure to provide her with reasonable accommodations in retaliation for her complaints, she said she was denied a promotion to a supervisor position. On Nov. 12, 2013, she was terminated for unsatisfactory job performance.

Creel is asking to be put back in her position, compensated for lost wages and benefits, be awarded compensatory damages and reimbursed for attorney fees.

Commissioner Battaglia referred all questions to County Solicitor Chase McClister or Human Resources Director Dan Lucavich. Neither could be reached for comment Friday evening. Bower, Fink and Creel did not immediately return calls for comment. Creel’s attorney, Nikki V. Lykos of Pittsburgh said she had no comment about the suit.

Julie E. Martin is a staff writer for Trib Total Media. She can be reached at 724-543-1303.

Categories: News
TribLIVE commenting policy

You are solely responsible for your comments and by using TribLive.com you agree to our Terms of Service.

We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.

While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.

We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers

We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.

We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.

We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.

We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.