Archive

ShareThis Page
Shady Side Academy runners celebrate successful season | TribLIVE.com
News

Shady Side Academy runners celebrate successful season

Tribune-Review
| Wednesday, November 26, 2014 12:03 p.m

The Shady Side Academy girls cross country had quite a successful campaign this past season, and coach Sue Whitney is setting the bar higher for next year.

“It was a tremendously successful season,” she said.

The Indians, led by seniors Elizabeth Ejzak, Angie Kim, AineMarie Policarto, Yasmine Islam, Sarah Small, Michelle Wolf, Alia Yossef and Ashley McIlroy, went undefeated in section matches as they posted an 8-0 mark. They also captured their first section title since 2009 and finished fourth at the WPIAL championships, narrowly missing a team trip to the PIAA meet.

“For us, the icing on the cake came from the outstanding performances of sophomore Lindsey Stauber and freshman Jeanne Lauer at states,” the coach said. “Lindsey finished 188th and Jeanne was 44th. It proved that we certainly have some outstanding young runners. Our fab five freshmen — Jeanne, Carolyn Woll, Megan McInerney, Jennifer Jaffe and Lucia Santos Huertas — will return stronger.”

The returning runners will include juniors Riya Gohel, Sydney Jones, Emily Natoli, Gabby Pollock, Alisa Pugacheva, Felicia Reuter, Anna Trefelner and Corinne Thompson.

“This team has an even brighter future ahead in cross country,” Whitney said. “Perhaps the most pleasant surprise this season was the number of new runners, particularly the freshmen, all of whom earned a varsity letter. That was a first for our program.

“We’re hoping for a top three finish at WPIALs in 2015 and to have company for Lindsey and Jeanne at states.”

Marty Stewart is a staff writer for Trib Total Media. Reach him at 412-782-2123 or mstewart@tribweb.com.

TribLIVE commenting policy

You are solely responsible for your comments and by using TribLive.com you agree to our Terms of Service.

We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.

While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.

We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers

We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.

We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.

We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.

We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.