ShareThis Page
Shaler man successfully sues to get his retirement records |

Shaler man successfully sues to get his retirement records

Brian Bowling
| Thursday, April 3, 2014 5:23 p.m

A federal agency has finally given a Shaler man his retirement records, according to federal court documents.

Daniel Sagi, 57, sued the Office of Personnel Management in March after requesting the records four times in the past eight months without getting a response.

The retired postal worker needed the documents so his lawyer could evaluate the agency’s claim that it overpaid him on his pension.

U.S. District Judge Maurice Cohill on Thursday approved a motion filed by lawyers from both sides to dismiss the case based on the agency handing over the records and agreeing to pay Sagi $1,250 for the legal costs he incurred by suing.

Categories: News
TribLIVE commenting policy

You are solely responsible for your comments and by using you agree to our Terms of Service.

We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.

While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.

We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers

We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.

We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.

We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.

We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.