ShareThis Page
Shero, Pens ‘Poni’ up for scoring-line winger |

Shero, Pens ‘Poni’ up for scoring-line winger

| Wednesday, March 3, 2010 12:00 a.m

General manager Ray Shero wasn’t afraid Tuesday to pony up for a scoring line winger the night before the NHL trade deadline expired.

After the Penguins’ 3-2 win over the Buffalo Sabres at Mellon Arena, Shero announced a deal with Toronto for scoring-line winger Alexei Ponikarovsky — a 6-foot-4, 229-pound winger who will likely play to the left of center Evgeni Malkin.

Ponikarovsky is likely to join longtime friend Ruslan Fedotenko on a line with Malkin, the leading scorer during the regular season and playoffs last year. Ponikarovsky, 29, and Fedotenko were born a year apart in Kiev, Ukraine.

“He’s a good, hard-working winger,” said Fedotenko. “He drives to the net hard. He’s a good player. I think it’s a good addition.

“We’re ready for the last 19 games now, and the playoffs.”

Shero agreed, and acknowledged he was surprised the Penguins could land a scoring winger after dealing a second-round pick to Florida on Monday for defenseman Jordan Leopold.

“It pushes some guys down in the lineup,” Shero said of this acquisition, adding that the Penguins are “capped out” on making another move related to the NHL roster before the today’s 3 p.m. trade deadline.

The Penguins are about $100,000 within the NHL’s $56.8 million salary cap. The should have just enough cap space to recall AHL players for practices as the regular season wraps because returning Olympians are likely to be given reprieves from upcoming practices.

To land Ponikarovsky, who had scored 19 goals and recorded 41 points in 61 games with Toronto, the Penguins surrendered a prized prospect in winger Luca Caputi. To make room for Ponikarovsky’s prorated cap hit of about $488,000, they were forced to deal veteran defenseman Martin Skoula, who counted approximately $133,000 against the salary ceiling.

Skoula, 30, had appeared in 33 games after signing late during training camp. He had played in only three of the last 18 games.

Caputi, 21, a 6-3 winger who could add to his 200-pound frame, was at one time considered the top forward prospect in the organization. Eric Tangradi was among four prospects Shero would not move at the deadline. Others were 2010 first-round pick Simon Despres and developing defensemen Robert Bortuzzo and Ben Lovejoy, who is a candidate to play in the NHL next season.

Shero also steadfastly refused to move the Penguins’ 2010 first-round pick, and he wasn’t looking to deal Caputi, the club’s fourth-round pick (111th overall) in 2007.

“(The Maple Leafs’ offer) kind of came back to me in the afternoon, and Luca was the guy they wanted,” he said. “We had a long discussion internally. That was not a guy we wanted to trade or looking to trade. But at the end of the day, Ponikarovsky was that guy for us.

“I didn’t think this was a deal we’d be able to do, and if you’d have told me we could have done this a few days ago I’d have said, ‘No way.’ This gives us a chance to be a good team again.”

Defenseman Alex Goligoski said the acquisitions of Leopold and Ponikarovsky, each playing on expiring contracts at a combined approximate cap hit of $880,000 (prorated), sends a clear message to teams looking to dethrone the Penguins as Stanley Cup champions.

“I think the idea was to get a couple of players that could come in here and help out, and maybe put a little fear into other teams,” he said.

Categories: News
TribLIVE commenting policy

You are solely responsible for your comments and by using you agree to our Terms of Service.

We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.

While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.

We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers

We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.

We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.

We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.

We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.