Shift work erodes cognitive ability, study finds |

Shift work erodes cognitive ability, study finds

The Los Angeles Times

Working an irregular schedule that includes afternoon and night shifts can seriously sap your brain power, research shows.

For people who spent more than a decade on this type of rotating schedule, the effects were equivalent to 6.5 years of normal, age-related cognitive decline, according to a study in the journal Occupational & Environmental Medicine.

Even people who spent at least 50 days in a single year working any type of irregular work schedule — including regular shifts that prevented them from going to sleep before midnight or that forced them to wake up before 5 a.m. — suffered a significant mental toll. Tests revealed that these workers experienced the equivalent of 4.3 years of age-related cognitive decline, on average, even if their shift work happened years ago.

Researchers found evidence that people’s brains can recover after their work schedules return to normal. People who hadn’t worked rotating shifts for at least five years had cognitive test scores that were about the same as those of people who had never worked such a schedule.

People who were working a rotating schedule had worse scores — the equivalent of 5.8 years of age-related decline. Even worse were people who had stopped working a rotating schedule within the past five years; their scores indicated the equivalent of 6.9 years of age-related cognitive decline.

When the researchers expanded the analysis to include people who experienced any kind of irregular work schedule, the results were similar.

All of the data came from VISAT, a long-term study of salaried workers from southern France. The workers, who held a wide range of jobs, were given questionnaires and clinical exams as many as three times in a 10-year period.

Work schedules that are out of sync with the body’s natural circadian rhythm can harm mental function.

TribLIVE commenting policy

You are solely responsible for your comments and by using you agree to our Terms of Service.

We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.

While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.

We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers

We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.

We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.

We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.

We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.