ShareThis Page
Shooting after game retaliatory, police say |

Shooting after game retaliatory, police say

| Friday, January 21, 2005 12:00 p.m

A gunman opened fire on a crowd leaving the gymnasium of Taylor Allderdice High School in Squirrel Hill moments after a basketball game ended, acting in retaliation for a shooting that took place a month earlier in Homewood, police said Thursday.

No one was injured Tuesday when the gunman fired four or five rounds from a .40-caliber handgun near the gym’s entrance on the 2400 block of Shady Avenue at 9:30 p.m. Witnesses told police one person had been wounded, but authorities were unable to confirm that.

“The information I have is that the shooting involved two groups from Homewood and that it had nothing to do with Allderdice students,” Allderdice principal Robert McMurray said.

Investigators suspect that the shooter and intended victim were both adults and not students at Allderdice or Peabody High School, the opposing team in the basketball game. Police recovered shell casings from the scene.

Police say they have video footage of a man firing a handgun, and school authorities said they are reviewing footage of a person of interest getting into a car and driving off. Investigators are reviewing the footage in hopes of identifying those involved.

Theories spreading through the Allderdice hallways that a football player had been the intended target turned out to be bogus, school officials and police said.

Another rumor, that the shooting was the result of a love triangle between a Allderdice girl and a former boyfriend at Westinghouse High School, also was discounted by authorities.

Categories: News
TribLIVE commenting policy

You are solely responsible for your comments and by using you agree to our Terms of Service.

We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.

While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.

We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers

We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.

We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.

We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.

We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.