ShareThis Page
Silk Screen film festival gala draws 400 celebrants |

Silk Screen film festival gala draws 400 celebrants

| Sunday, May 12, 2013 9:00 p.m
John Altdorfer
Banner dancers perform during the Silk Screen fundraiser for the Asian-American Film Festival at the Rivers Club.
John Altdorfer
Ruby Jain during the Silk Screen fundraiser for the Asian-American Film Festival at the Rivers Club.
John Altdorfer
Katie Jones and Harish Saluja during the Silk Screen fundraiser for the Asian-American Film Festival at the Rivers Club.

It’s doubtful that the Rivers Club has ever been adorned like it was on May 10. Beholden to an enticing array of visual eye candy, a crowd of 400 was eager to partake in surroundings for the Silk Screen Asian American Film Festival Gala.

The pounding of throaty drums and clanging cymbals signaled the entrance of a Chinese lion, while locally based dancers brought even more international flair and a finale of belly dancers punctuated the evening.

“Dance is a language that you don’t need to know to understand,” said coordinator Ruby Jain.

Through May 19, the showcase of Asian films and filmmakers with origins in Asian cultures will include 59 showings at the Regent Square Theater, the Melwood Screening Room and the Carnegie Museum of History’s Earth Theater.

Making the rounds with executive director Harish Saluja were Katie Jones (in one of the many dazzling saris seen floating by throughout the evening), Sumedha Nagpal, Aseem Chhabra,Mona andDan Mattson, Krishna Sharma, Brian Siewiorek, Kathryn Heidemann, Reema Singh, Poonam Sood and Tulasi Gude. WTAE’s Sally Wiggin emceed.

Categories: News
TribLIVE commenting policy

You are solely responsible for your comments and by using you agree to our Terms of Service.

We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.

While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.

We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers

We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.

We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.

We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.

We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.