ShareThis Page
Size, rebounding carry Knoch past Kittanning |

Size, rebounding carry Knoch past Kittanning

Erica Dietz | Trib Total Media
Knoch's Aiden Albert dribbles past Kittanning's Joey McCanna on Friday, Dec. 26, 2014, at Freeport.
Erica Dietz | Trib Total Media
Knoch's Aiden Albert dribbles past Kittanning's Joey McCanna on Friday, Dec. 26, 2014, at Freeport.

The Knoch boys basketball team emphasizes rebounding in each practice. That extra work — and a notable size advantage — benefited the Knights on Friday night.

Behind a dominant rebounding effort, Knoch overwhelmed Kittanning, 62-37, in the opening game of the Freeport tournament.

“We haven’t been shooting the ball well from the perimeter, and we put a lot of time into that,” Knoch coach Ron McNabb said. “One of our points of emphasis every day in practice is rebounding — offensive rebounding, get to the boards. I think we’re getting through to these guys how important that is.”

Matt Zanella led a balanced scoring attack for Knoch (5-3), finishing with 14 points despite sitting out nearly half the first and second quarters with foul trouble. P.J. Gourley added 13 points off the bench, and Austin Hannes had 11.

A majority of the Knights’ points came inside as they attacked Kittanning’s smaller front line. Zanella and Gourley stand 6-foot-4, while fellow forward Mac Christy is 6-3. Kittanning’s tallest starter, Tanner Witenski, is 6-3, but the Knights’ next-tallest player is 6-1.

“They had a couple guys in there who were not as big as us, but they were physical kids,” McNabb said. “Kittanning always plays hard and physical like that, and that’s why I was looking forward to this game. I liked the way our guys responded.”

Kittanning (2-6) played its fourth straight game without leading scorer Noah Kunst, who injured his ankle earlier this month against Greensburg Salem. Zane Dudek and Noah Spang scored 13 points each to lead the Wildcats.

“It took a couple games for us to really get the experience without (Kunst) in the game,” Kittanning coach Bill Henry said. “Kids are always looking for him, obviously, so now when he’s not there, it’s taken some practice and taken a couple games. We played well at times here, but obviously we missed his 3-point shooting and his ability to rebound.”

Knoch never trailed, taking control of the game almost from the opening tip. Even though Zanella, the Knights’ leading scorer, picked up his second foul midway through the first quarter, Knoch led 13-6 after the period and 28-15 at halftime.

“Our weakness is we’re not very tall,” Henry said. “They outrebounded us. That really hurt us on the offensive and defensive ends. We’d make a stop, we’d get the shot we wanted them to take, but we couldn’t get the defensive rebound. They just did a great job on the boards.”

McNabb credited Gourley, a sophomore, and some of the team’s other young players for the way they responded. Gourley scored eight of his 13 points in the first half. Fellow sophomores Hannes and Devin Campbell came on strong in the second half, when Hannes scored nine of his 11 points and Campbell tallied six of his nine.

“For a long stretch there, we had five sophomores out there on the court,” McNabb said. “I really liked the way our sophomores executed. They didn’t back down, and they really worked at it.”

Doug Gulasy is a staff writer for Trib Total Media. Reach him at or via Twitter @dgulasy_Trib.

TribLIVE commenting policy

You are solely responsible for your comments and by using you agree to our Terms of Service.

We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.

While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.

We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers

We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.

We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.

We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.

We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.