Small-business lessons from Red Hen’s Sanders ouster |

Small-business lessons from Red Hen’s Sanders ouster

The Associated Press
FILE- In this June 23, 2018, file photo, passersby gather to take photos in front of the Red Hen Restaurant in Lexington, Va. The restaurant has become internationally famous since ousting Sarah Huckabee Sanders over the weekend. (AP Photo/Daniel Lin, File)

NEW YORK — Taking a political stand — like asking a White House press secretary to leave your restaurant — can be polarizing and risky. So experts say an owner who decides to act should do so with forethought and civility.

The Red Hen in Lexington, Virginia, has become internationally famous since ousting Sarah Huckabee Sanders over the weekend. The owner had consulted with employees, who said Sanders made them feel uncomfortable. It was an on-the-spot decision, and led to condemnation by President Donald Trump, an onslaught of negative Yelp reviews and global media coverage.

Under federal law, restaurants and other businesses can not discriminate based on age, race, national origin, religious beliefs, gender, disability, pregnancy or veteran status. But other issues are fair game (thus the sign “No shoes, no shirt, no service”). Whether it’s worth it is another matter.

“Any time a restaurant company or a brand takes a political stand these days, the country is so polarized they run the risk of losing as many customers as they can gain,” said Allen Adamson, co-founder of branding firm Metaforce.

The Red Hen’s co-owner Stephanie Wilkinson told The Washington Post that her staff had called her to report Sanders was in the restaurant. She cited several reasons, including the concerns of several restaurant employees who were gay and knew Sanders had defended Trump’s desire to bar transgender people from the military.

It’s a risk to act out on political beliefs based on what your staff thinks — but it’s a gamble to ignore them, too.

Small businesses must ensure they’re paying attention to their customers and employees and making sure their message stays on brand, said Andrew Park, vice president at customer experience management company InMoment.

“If you’re in touch with customers and understand what your employees think, you have a shared group of values and you’re in a better situation to make the right call when you need to,” he said.

A restaurant in a “blue state bubble,” might gain from a move such as Red Hen’s, he said, but many people on both sides of the spectrum also thought the restaurant “shouldn’t punish people for their political views.”

While the Red Hen incident happened in the moment, a small business making a foray into politics works best when there’s a game plan, said Tina Cassidy, executive vice president and chief content officer of public relations firm Inkhouse.

“What we would recommend from a PR perspective is if you’re going to be a business and take a stand on an issue, that you have thought through the next steps attached to it,” she said. The Red Hen owner, she said, could have used the limelight as an opportunity to talk in greater depth about how she wants the nation to behave, or hopes for employees, or how policies the Trump administration put in place affect the workforce.

“You want to tie it to a higher cause, bigger meaning or specific outcome you want to see in the world,” she said. “Without that, it’s just a one-off protest.”

In the end, the best strategy is to be considerate, Cassidy said.

“It’s hard to lose when you lead with kindness in terms of how you’re communicating.”

TribLIVE commenting policy

You are solely responsible for your comments and by using you agree to our Terms of Service.

We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.

While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.

We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers

We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.

We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.

We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.

We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.