ShareThis Page
Smoking appraisal turns 50 |

Smoking appraisal turns 50

Luis Fábregas
| Saturday, January 11, 2014 12:01 a.m

You gotta love smokers.

The sub-zero weather that slammed the region this week didn’t seem to affect them one bit.

I observed plenty of office workers sneaking outside to puff on cigarettes. It was quite fascinating to watch them, their faces covered with scarves, their gloved hands trying to hold onto a cigarette.

“Got to get my fix,” one of them told me as I strolled out of my office building on the North Shore.

Surely some of these brave smokers are unaware that today is the 50th anniversary of 1964’s landmark surgeon general report on smoking. The report highlighted the addictive power of nicotine as well as the dangers of secondhand smoking. It was the country’s first wake-up call about a habit that many people took up just for the fun of it.

A lot has happened in half a century. Smoking rates have dropped 59 percent. Long gone are the smoking sections at Eat N’ Park and offices where you could find an ashtray next to the paper clip holder. Big employers such as UPMC won’t even allow workers to smoke during the workday.

More significantly, at least 8 million premature, smoking-related deaths were prevented from 1964 to 2012, according to an analysis published this month in the prestigious Journal of the American Medical Association. Those 8 million people gained an average of 20 years of life, the analysis showed.

Yet the fight is far from over. Just about 42 million Americans still smoke, according to the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. Worldwide, roughly 30 percent of men smoke and about 8 percent of women smoke. Young people aren’t afraid to give smoking a try, with more than 3,000 teens picking up their first cigarette every day, according to one anti-smoking advocacy group. The high school smoking rate, which shot up to 36.4 percent in 1997, dropped to 18.1 percent in 2011, but that’s still a lot of young people who assume they look cool with a cigarette in their hand.

While some smokers show decorum and respect to those of us who don’t smoke, a notable few continue to engage in exceedingly annoying habits. Some toss cigarettes out of cars (my ultimate pet peeve) while young mothers push strollers and blow smoke near their young children.

“Nicotine is still highly addictive,” Dr. Hilary Tindle, a UPMC internist who specializes in smoking cessation, told me.

It’s no surprise that health and anti-smoking advocates are using the report’s 50th anniversary to highlight the harms of smoking. Those dangers aren’t new but remain exceedingly relevant: cancer, heart disease, emphysema, stroke, not to mention how it can affect things we don’t think about, such as infant mortality.

Some might argue that lives could be saved through policy changes such as increasing cigarette taxes and passing more smoke-free laws. But the truth is smoking needs to be treated as the addiction that it is.

The brain loves how nicotine triggers all sorts of chemicals that make some people feel better. That’s why we’ll never get rid of smoking, just as we’ll never get rid of alcohol — people just like to feel good.

If we can’t get smokers to quit altogether, at the very least we can convince them that they look ridiculous when they’re puffing away in zero-degree weather.

Luis Fábregas is Trib Total Media’s medical editor. He can be reached at 412-320-7998 or

Categories: News
TribLIVE commenting policy

You are solely responsible for your comments and by using you agree to our Terms of Service.

We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.

While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.

We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers

We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.

We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.

We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.

We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.