ShareThis Page
Soldier with Western Pa. ties killed in Iraq |

Soldier with Western Pa. ties killed in Iraq

The Associated Press
| Friday, September 30, 2005 12:00 a.m

GROVE CITY — A soldier with Western Pennsylvania ties was killed in Iraq when his vehicle rolled over, according to the military and his family.

Sgt. Shawn A. Graham, 34, of Brazoria, Texas, was killed Sunday in Baghdad, the Army said. Graham was originally from Grove City, Mercer County, where the Cunningham Funeral Home will handle arrangements once his body is returned, his family said.

Graham’s mother, Kathleen, said her son was happy to be sent to Iraq in January, because his father and brother already had been sent to the Middle East.

“At one point, I had all three there — two in Iraq and one in Afghanistan,” Kathleen Graham said. “He was just so upset when he found out his dad (and brother) got activated before him. He just thought, ‘If they can go, why can’t I go?’ ”

Graham’s father, Thomas, returned less than two months ago from Afghanistan, where he served with the Indiana National Guard, she said. Nicholas Graham, a brother, returned in March after serving in Iraq with the Marines.

Sgt. Shawn Graham was a member of the Army National Guard’s 124th Cavalry Regiment, 34th Infantry Division, out of Fort Worth, Texas.

Graham served 10 years in the Marines after graduating from Grove City High School in 1989. He was inactive for a year, then was reactivated after the Sept. 11, 2001, terrorist attacks. By then he had moved to Texas where he joined the National Guard.

Graham’s wife, Jeannette, still lives in Brazoria.

Categories: News
TribLIVE commenting policy

You are solely responsible for your comments and by using you agree to our Terms of Service.

We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.

While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.

We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers

We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.

We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.

We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.

We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.