ShareThis Page
Some facts about the ‘pledge’ |

Some facts about the ‘pledge’

| Tuesday, March 23, 2004 12:00 a.m

Dear Editor:

Does every pledge of allegiance establish a religion — the worship of government• As a Libertarian, and an attorney too, I am fascinated by the Pledge of Allegiance case to be argued on March 24 before the U.S. Supreme Court. As a pro bono service, I help educate the public about the court case.

Few people know that if they pledge allegiance to the flag then they recite a pledge written by a self-proclaimed socialist in the U.S. nationalist movement, to promote socialism in the most socialistic institution — government schools.

Few people know that the original salute to the flag was like the National Socialist German Workers’ Party salute and predated it. (photos at

The pledge was authored in 1892 by Francis Bellamy, first cousin and follower of the socialist author Edward Bellamy. Edward Bellamy’s futuristic novel, “Looking Backward,” (1888) described life in the year 2000. It described a totalitarian society where private trade is outlawed, where all men are in an “industrial army,” and where the monolithic government school is part of the “industrial army” system. Bellamy saw it as utopia.

As strange as it may seem, the totalitarian ideas that inspired the pledge’s author resulted in mass atrocities worldwide.

Rex Curry

Attorney At Law

P.O. Box 8816

Tampa, Fla.


Categories: News
TribLIVE commenting policy

You are solely responsible for your comments and by using you agree to our Terms of Service.

We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.

While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.

We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers

We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.

We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.

We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.

We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.