ShareThis Page
Sophie Kinsella’s ‘Twenties Girl’ is a fun read |

Sophie Kinsella’s ‘Twenties Girl’ is a fun read

| Sunday, September 6, 2009 12:00 a.m

In “Twenties Girl,” chick-lit queen Sophie Kinsella introduces readers to Lara Lington, a 27-year-old Brit who sees something no one else can see: a ghost.

Lara’s great-aunt Sadie shows up at her own funeral — as a young woman in her prime, from the 1920s, with one last request. Sadie needs to find a missing necklace, and she wants Lara’s help.

The plot is far-fetched, but “Twenties Girl” isn’t all detective work. The story also follows Sadie and Lara — who have great chemistry on the page — as they relate as women from different eras. This is the best part of the novel. Although they bicker back and forth, Sadie and Lara also perform tender acts of love and generosity toward one other.

There’s a laugh-out-loud scene where Sadie makes Lara go on a date with a man she fancies so that she can experience it vicariously. She dresses Lara in full 1920s garb, including a flapper dress, headband with a feather and long, beaded necklaces. Lara begrudgingly agrees to do whatever Sadie says, which includes greeting her date with an enthusiastic “Hello, Daddy-O!” and then getting him to dance in the middle of a crowded bar.

If there’s one complaint, it’s that Kinsella’s main characters tend to be neurotic, self-conscious, down-on-their-luck women who find themselves in absurd situations (like being able to see a ghost). It would be nice to see Kinsella, author of the popular “Shopaholic” series, step out of her comfort zone and write a character who is completely different, with a unique voice.

“Twenties Girl” is a light, fun read. With the right cast, it could even be a fun movie.

Additional Information:


Categories: News
TribLIVE commenting policy

You are solely responsible for your comments and by using you agree to our Terms of Service.

We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.

While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.

We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers

We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.

We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.

We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.

We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.