South Korea’s leader calls North’s attack a ‘crime’ |

South Korea’s leader calls North’s attack a ‘crime’

SEOUL — South Korea’s President Lee Myung-bak, in an address to the nation yesterday, denounced North Korea’s attack on a remote island in the Yellow Sea nearly one week ago as “a crime against humanity.”

Lee, talking on South Korea’s television networks, said he could hardly “contain my anger over the North Korean regime’s cruelty” in a bombardment that killed four people — two civilians and two South Korean marines.

Moments after he spoke, North Korea fired off a rhetorical blast against the United States and South Korean naval exercises in the Yellow Sea, 50 miles south of the scene, promising “merciless punishment.”

While the war of words raged between North and South Korea, the flotilla, led by the aircraft carrier George Washington, conducted what a South Korean military spokesman said were “high intensity” war games featuring mock attacks and target practice “on a 24-hour basis.”

The exercises are to wind up Wednesday, but concerns about the will of the South Koreans and the Americans to defend the South effectively were sure to persist. “It’s just rhetoric,” says Chang Ki-tak, a retired businessman, after listening to Lee’s speech. “It was a hard-line speech, but anybody can say those things.”

On the streets of Seoul, clouds of concern seem to have cast a shadow over the lives of people who might prefer to shrug off the attack on Yeonpyeong Island as an isolated episode, one of a series since the Korean War ended in an armistice — not a peace treaty — in July 1953.

“That’s the second attack we’ve had in recent months,” says Lee Nam-bok, a housewife otherwise preoccupied with making kimchi, the fermented and pickled vegetable that is traditionally made at this time of year. “Our president said the same thing after the attack on the Cheonan” — the naval vessel that was split in two by a torpedo and sank with a loss of the lives of 46 sailors in March.

TribLIVE commenting policy

You are solely responsible for your comments and by using you agree to our Terms of Service.

We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.

While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.

We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers

We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.

We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.

We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.

We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.