ShareThis Page
Southmoreland to buy climate-control system |

Southmoreland to buy climate-control system

Sam Kusic
| Friday, September 2, 2005 12:00 a.m

The Southmoreland School District board of directors agreed on Thursday to purchase a new computer system to control the heating, ventilation and air-conditioning systems in all of its school buildings.

The board acted on a proposal from Earl Cramer, maintenance supervisor, and John Puskar, technology coordinator, to buy the $43,000 system from O.Z. Enterprises Inc., of Pittsburgh.

Puskar and Cramer told the board that the current computer system dates to the 1980s and that the dedicated wires connecting the buildings to a central computer have been struck by lightning several times in recent years.

This year alone, the district has spent $8,000 to replace parts damaged by lightning, Puskar said.

“It’s been a bear,” Cramer said.

Even now, Cramer said, the system isn’t fully operational, meaning that he can’t control the temperature in every part of every building from his office computer. So, he said, if adjustments are required, he has to physically go to the building.

Lightning shouldn’t be a problem with the new system, they said, because the buildings would be linked to his computer via the district’s fiber optic network. Fiber optic cable is made of glass and is not susceptible to lightning strikes.

The cost of the new system includes hardware, software and installation.

Categories: News
TribLIVE commenting policy

You are solely responsible for your comments and by using you agree to our Terms of Service.

We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.

While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.

We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers

We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.

We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.

We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.

We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.