Spoiled city needs fresh start, not board |

Spoiled city needs fresh start, not board

If Republican state Sen. Jane Orie of McCandless becomes Pittsburgh’s guardian angel, city Democrats will demonize her while secretly calling her a godsend.

If Orie’s effort to create a bipartisan oversight board to manage the nearly bankrupt city succeeds, it will be a win/win for Pittsburgh — and the Democratic Party that is responsible for the ‘Burgh’s demise. Why does Orie want to do the dirty work for the culprits who are ruining Pittsburgh, especially when they could correct their own mistakes?

“They have the power to do it, but I do not have the confidence that it will be done without the board,” Orie said.

Her efforts might look like political adeptness from McKnight Road. From Grant Street, it looks more like political ineptness. Sometimes the best political advice is “don’t just do something. Stand there.” Sometimes it’s also the best advice for parents.

Children must learn that bad choices have bad consequences. Politicians have to learn the same lesson.

The Democrats have run Pittsburgh into the ground after six decades under their rule. Smoke and mirrors budgets, high taxes, low-quality services, Faustian deals with firefighters and police unions, and publicly financed monumental mistakes such as stadiums, convention centers ad nauseam have caused a mass exodus of residents since the 1950s and a $40 million deficit this year.

Mayor Tom Murphy and other Democrats refuse to do what needs to be done, such as reduce taxes, improve services by privatizing them, sell assets such as the asphalt plant, stand up to the unions, stop paying for white elephant projects and prepare realistic budgets.

Just when the city finally is facing the consequences of its actions, Orie rides to the rescue.

If a state oversight board forces the city politicians to act responsibly, the Democrats will have their cake and eat it, too. The city will be solvent and Orie’s board will be blamed for the tough choices.

“Don’t blame us,” the Democrats will scream with glee. “It’s Orie’s fault.”

Pittsburgh’s yinzers will believe them. The board will allow the Democrats to act as though they are victims of greedy, power hungry, union-hating suburban Republicans.

With no board, Grant Street will be forced to act — or have the city go belly up. The Democrats will be forced to privatize, renegotiate and stop building monuments to trickle-down government. Then voters will see the real cost of decades of liberalism.

Democrats would be blamed, and that could lead to cracks in this Democratic fortress we call the city of Pittsburgh.

Good parents understand that children sometimes must experience the consequences of their actions or else they will be conditioned to expect that someone will miraculously heal their self-inflicted wounds.

When a reckless teen driver causes an accident, and then turns to his parents to bail him out of trouble, he never learns what it means to be responsible.

TribLIVE commenting policy

You are solely responsible for your comments and by using you agree to our Terms of Service.

We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.

While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.

We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers

We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.

We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.

We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.

We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.