Archive

ShareThis Page
Sports Authority approves Hill agreement | TribLIVE.com
News

Sports Authority approves Hill agreement

Tribune-Review
| Thursday, August 7, 2008 12:00 p.m

The Sports & Exhibition Authority approved the outline of a community benefits agreement with Hill District residents this morning.

Unless Allegheny County Chief Executive Dan Onorato and Mayor Luke Ravenstahl sign it soon, however, residents could protest the arena’s groundbreaking, scheduled for Thursday.

It’s unclear exactly what they’d sign, however. The SEA board of directors gave unanimous approval to the agreement, even though it hasn’t been finalized.

“We approved the concept we’ve been talking about for many months,” said Mary Conturo, executive director of the authority.

The board also approved four arena construction contracts worth a total of $38.5 million. The arena, which will replace Mellon Arena as the Penguins hockey team’s home, is scheduled to be ready for the 2010-11 season. It is expected to cost between $290 million and $310 million.

The community agreement, meant to ensure the Hill benefits from the arena’s construction, will include a master development plan for the neighborhood, a grocery store and regular updates to keep residents apprised of job openings associated with the project.

It also will include tax credits meant to spur $500,000 in private business investment in the area, said Carl Redwood, chairman of the One Hill community group that has been negotiating the agreement with county and city leaders.

The sports authority plans to track how many local residents get jobs building the arena by monitoring how many workers list a 15219 ZIP code for their home address.

“The most important part of this is the community came together to make sure the neighborhood benefitted,” Redwood said. “It’s not about what you get. It’s about the process. People in the community came together, and worked very hard over the last year.”

Onorato and Ravenstahl are expected to attend the arena groundbreaking Thursday, along with Gov. Ed Rendell and Penguins officials. If the agreement isn’t signed by then, One Hill activists could try to stop construction, Redwood said.

“The position of our coalition ahs been we’ll do everything we can to stop the construction unless we have the Community Benefits Agreement,” Redwood said. He added that he expects Onorato and Ravenstahl to sign the deal soon.

Categories: News
TribLIVE commenting policy

You are solely responsible for your comments and by using TribLive.com you agree to our Terms of Service.

We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.

While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.

We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers

We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.

We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.

We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.

We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.