ShareThis Page
Sports editor held for trial in sex case |

Sports editor held for trial in sex case

Sam Kusic
| Saturday, October 1, 2005 12:00 a.m

A sports editor at an area newspaper was ordered to stand trial Friday on charges that he tried to set up a sexual encounter through the Internet with a 12-year-old girl.

Thomas J. Rose, 52, of Washington, Pa., is charged with attempted unlawful contact with a minor and criminal use of a communication facility. He was a sports editor at the Observer-Reporter in Washington.

The state Attorney General’s office alleges that Rose tried to set up a meeting with a girl through an Internet chat room. But the girl was agent Lisa Ceh, who works for the Attorney General’s Child Predator Unit.

Ceh posed as a seventh-grader named “Jessica” in an Internet chat room for teens on Sept. 9. She was contacted by a man who authorities say was Rose.

Rose allegedly said he wanted to meet her. The two talked several times in the following days. They set up a rendezvous for Sept. 16 at a McDonald’s off Route 30 in North Huntingdon Township, which is where Rose was arrested.

Yesterday, Ceh testified before District Judge Douglas R. Weimer Jr. that Rose brought condoms with him, as she had requested.

Rose remains free on bond.

Park Burroughs, the Observer-Reporter’s editor, said he couldn’t comment on Rose’s status with the newspaper, citing employer-employee confidentiality.

However, he has said that Rose won’t be working at the paper in the near future.

Categories: News
TribLIVE commenting policy

You are solely responsible for your comments and by using you agree to our Terms of Service.

We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.

While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.

We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers

We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.

We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.

We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.

We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.