ShareThis Page
Springdale Legion, hurt by vacation losses, exits Region 6 tournament |

Springdale Legion, hurt by vacation losses, exits Region 6 tournament

| Sunday, July 21, 2013 10:06 p.m

For many years, it was thought the team that had the best chance of advancing in the American Legion playoffs was the team with the deepest pitching staff.

These days, it often seems the team that avoids players going on vacation has the best chance of success.

With three starters on vacation, Springdale exited the Region 6 playoffs after a 12-4 loss to Uniontown on Sunday at Beaver Falls High School.

Players not sticking around has Springdale manager Frank Sweeney and others programs perplexed.

Upper St. Clair won its Allegheny County division title but didn’t make the trip to regionals because of a lack of players. USC was replaced by West Mifflin.

River City, from the Ellwood City area, also withdrew when too many players went on vacation. Legion officials were ready to slot in the Hopewell vs. Ambridge-Baden winner, but Hopewell bowed out.

“It seems like the teams like Blackhawk and Uniontown, with 17, 18 players on full rosters can usually do well,” Sweney said. “We were doing all right until the vacation stuff came.”

With a makeshift lineup and players performing at unfamiliar positions, Springdale committed nine errors.

Springdale (17-7, 13-3) led, 2-1, after one inning. Uniontown took the lead with a pair of runs in the second and tallied six in the third inning, chasing Springdale starter and losing pitcher James Sirro.

Sirro and Joe Palumbo led Springdale with two doubles each.

“We ended up winning the Allegheny River East, so we’ll have to try and get ’em next year,” said Sweeney, who completed his 26th season Sunday.

George Guido is a freelance writer.

Categories: News
TribLIVE commenting policy

You are solely responsible for your comments and by using you agree to our Terms of Service.

We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.

While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.

We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers

We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.

We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.

We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.

We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.