Springdale meets familiar playoff opponent |

Springdale meets familiar playoff opponent

The last time Springdale’s football team moved through a season 9-1, in 2007, it reached the WPIAL Class A championship game at Heinz Field.

The Dynamos don’t want to get carried away, but they’ll gladly file last week’s 35-14 win over Western Beaver under good omens.

The first-round victory puts the fifth-seeded Dynamos in the quarterfinals for the seventh time in the last nine years, and they’ll see a familiar opponent — No. 4 seed Monessen (9-1).

Springdale and Monessen have met four times in the playoffs in the last seven seasons. Springdale has won all four meetings, including 21-14 in the first round last year.

“It seems like it always comes down to us and them,” Monessen coach Andy Pacak said.

In 2003, Springdale upset then-No. 1 seed Monessen, 22-7, in the quarterfinals, en route to its first WPIAL title since 1973.

“I don’t think there’s any question (Monessen) will be up for the occasion,” said Springdale’s Chuck Wagner, who is coaching in the playoffs for a local-record 14th time. “We’ll have to make sure to keep our heads on straight and realize that this could be another tough ball game.”

Springdale won the WPIAL title in 2003, were runners-up in ’07 and made the semifinals in ’04 and ’05. Another trip to the semis is in reach, but the Dynamos have to stay grounded on defense.

They put up 358 yards last week, all rushing, but allowed Western Beaver to throw for 209 yards. The secondary did, however, manage four interceptions, including three by senior safety Bill Arch.

“It was like an eye-opener for us,” Arch said. “Teams are going to be passing as we get deeper in the playoffs. It was a good test for us.”

Springdale hadn’t been tested much since Week 2 when it lost, 26-10, at Avonworth. Western Beaver seized momentum in the second half and had the Dynamos biting their nails, at least for a few series.

“That game may have been good for us, who knows?” Wagner said. “We hadn’t played a tight game for a good while. That made us reach for a little extra.”

Monessen downed Chartiers-Houston, 33-0, in the first round. The Greyhounds also have a strong running game, led by backs Brett Crenshaw and Trae Cook. Last week, Crenshaw ran for 121 yards and Cook added 63. Both scored a pair of touchdowns.

Quarterback Brady Kunsa could also present problems. He has completed 53 of 97 passes for 1,204 yards and 14 touchdowns.

Springdale has passed for 343 yards all season.

Monessen outgained Chartiers-Houston, 361-59 and limited it to four first downs. The Greyhounds have allowed just 88 points all season and only 672 yards rushing.

Additional Information:

At a glance

No. 5 seed Springdale (9-1) vs. No. 4 Monessen (9-1)

WPIAL Class A quarterfinals

7:30 p.m. Friday, at Warrior Stadium, Penn-Trafford

Coaches: Chuck Wagner, Springdale; Andy Pacak, Monessen.

Fast fact: Springdale has played Monessen four times in the playoffs since 2003, and has won all four, including a 21-14 victory last year in the first round.

Winner plays: No. 1 Clairton (10-0)/No. 9 Bishop Canevin (9-1) winner.

TribLIVE commenting policy

You are solely responsible for your comments and by using you agree to our Terms of Service.

We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.

While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.

We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers

We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.

We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.

We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.

We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.