ShareThis Page
St. Vincent guard close to a sure thing at the line |

St. Vincent guard close to a sure thing at the line

| Sunday, December 12, 2004 12:00 a.m

Sarah Rockwell has a simple formula for success at the free-throw line: dribble three times, spin the ball in her hands, look up and shoot.

“I always do the same thing when I go to the line,” she said. “I really don’t have any secret. It’s kind of built into my body. I know how hard to shoot and which direction to shoot.

“I try to keep it as simple as possible, because whenever you let it get to your head is when you make it start missing.”

That has never been a problem for Rockwell, a senior guard at St. Vincent. She made all 15 foul shots she attempted through the first four games this season, and in the process smashed a school record.

Going back to last season, Rockwell made 43 straight free throws — the longest string by any player, male or female, in St. Vincent history.

She went into this season two shy of the old school record of 29, which was set by Jim DiMuzio in the 1970-71 season. That mark fell in the season-opener Nov. 5 against Shawnee State, when Rockwell went 6 for 6.

“I didn’t even realize it until later,” Rockwell said. “It happened so fast. There were a couple games when I was at the line and just made them. The next thing I knew, I’d broken the record.”

The next day, she went 3 for 3 against Brescia. She failed to get to the line in the game against Rio Grande, then made another half-dozen foul shots on Nov. 13 against Cumberland to stretch her record out to 43.

“People didn’t want to talk to me about it, for fear that they’d jinx me,” Rockwell said. “My teammates were real supportive and excited for me. But in practice and outside of a game, nobody wanted to say anything to me.”

The NAIA Division II women’s record for consecutive free throws in a season is 51.

A St. Vincent official contacted the NAIA to see if Rockwell’s streak would count if it edged past 51, since it spanned two seasons. The NAIA never responded to the query.

By now, everyone in the program was aware of Rockwell’s running tally — no one more so than the shooter herself.

“I think it kind of started to get to my head after a while,” Rockwell admitted. “When you think about it enough, you start to think about that one you know you’re going to miss.”

The streak clanked to an end in the Nov. 16 game against Malone. In the first half, she went to the line for her first foul shot of the game.

Dribble, dribble, dribble. Spin. Shoot.

“I knew as soon as it left my fingers,” she said.

The ball smacked off the front of the rim, caromed to the backboard, and then bounced out.

“It was more disappointing than I thought it would be,” she said. “People talked about the streak and everything, but it really didn’t seem like that big of a deal to me until I missed it.”

The other St. Vincent players on the court dropped their heads for a moment. The season had gotten off to a terrible start — the Malone game would be the fifth of seven straight losses — and Rockwell’s streak had been something to look forward to.

“I’d like to get it back up again,” she said. “But it’s not something that I keep in the front of my mind.”

Going back to her career at Hempfield Area High School, Rockwell always has been a above-average foul shooter. One reason is her gritty style of play in the lane.

“I’m pretty well known as a player who will drive to the hoop,” she said. “I was always there (at the line) a lot because of the way I play. So, foul shooting is something that you need to be good at if you’re going to be there a lot.”

Categories: News
TribLIVE commenting policy

You are solely responsible for your comments and by using you agree to our Terms of Service.

We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.

While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.

We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers

We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.

We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.

We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.

We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.