ShareThis Page
Stanley says KISS has always broken new ground |

Stanley says KISS has always broken new ground

| Wednesday, December 9, 2009 12:00 a.m

Say what you will about KISS, but even after all these years, the face-painted foursome still is provocative.

This year, the band launched a first-ever, fan-routed tour, where fans voted on where the band would play. Final site selection weighed population size versus total votes. KISS also this year released “Sonic Boom,” its first album in 11 years (which entered the pop charts at No. 2, a career high for KISS).

If you ask Paul Stanley, KISS’ co-leader, the band is KISS at its best — with co-leader Gene Simmons at his side, as well as recent additions Tommy Thayer (guitar) and Eric Singer (drums).

We talked to Stanley about the fan-routed tour, its new album and why critics and multi-generations seem to love KISS these days. The tour wraps up on Tuesday in Ontario.

Question: How do you feel (the tour) has gone so far?

Answer: In terms of worldwide, it’s the biggest and most successful tour we’ve ever done. It’s been not only a great show in terms of turnout and response from the audience, but I’ve never seen so many great reviews. You have to remember we’re a band that’s always been loved by the public and hated by most critics. All of the sudden, either those critics are out of a job or they’ve had a change of heart, because it’s suspicious to see so many over-the-top reviews.

Q: Along those lines, I’ve seen pictures on your Web site of little kids and families at your concerts. Thirty years ago, that wasn’t the image people had of KISS.

A: KISS has always been about writing our own book as to who we are and what we are. It usually doesn’t follow what other bands are doing. At this point, we are so multigenerational and proud of it. We do have new fans, meaning teens and 20s, but we also have older fans with their kids. For many people, KISS has always been the soundtrack to their lives, so it’s passing something along to their kids. I couldn’t be more proud of the band and what we mean to so many different people.

Q: Where does that dedication come from• What is it about the band that inspires that in people?

A: I think it’s the idea of being the underdog who always manages to win. We’ve had a career of doing things our way in the face of every known obstacle — and we do more than survive, we thrive. I think it’s an inspiration to other people, that if you believe in what you’re doing and if you believe in yourself, nothing can stop you.

Q: Let’s talk about your fan-routed tour idea. It got a good response and got a lot of attention. But afterward, I heard some moaning and groaning from different cities. Do you think, overall, it was successful?

A: You’re always under a magnifying glass when you do something different. It seemed to make a lot of people happy, and, of course, there’s going to be some disgruntled fans. Our goal is not to do that, but it’s almost unavoidable.

Q: Is it something you would do again?

A: I think we’d think twice about it. It’s always interesting — we tend to lead the way and, perhaps, sometimes get the sticks and stones thrown at us and plow the way for other bands to do it with a little less bad publicity. When we started putting out merchandise, oh my God, it was sacrilege: “Rock ‘n’ roll bands don’t do that.” Well, all those rock ‘n’ roll bands who wouldn’t do it, once they saw the checks they were missing, (they) found their way into fan clubs.

Categories: News
TribLIVE commenting policy

You are solely responsible for your comments and by using you agree to our Terms of Service.

We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.

While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.

We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers

We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.

We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.

We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.

We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.