State caseworker accused of offering woman benefits in exchange for sexual favors |

State caseworker accused of offering woman benefits in exchange for sexual favors

A state caseworker accused of offering a woman benefits in exchange for sexual favors might have victimized more women, the Allegheny County District Attorney’s Office said Tuesday.

John Geary, 41, of North Versailles waived his right to a preliminary hearing on charges of bribery, promoting prostitution, patronizing prostitutes, solicitation and official oppression. He could not be reached for comment.

A woman told detectives that when she met with Geary, her caseworker at the state Department of Public Welfare’s McKeesport office, he told her he has “helped” other girls in her situation and said, “I help girls out who help me out,” according to a criminal complaint. Geary was suspended from his job when he was arrested earlier this month, a department spokeswoman said.

“Because of these statements, the District Attorney’s Office believes that there may be other potential victims of this defendant’s pattern of behavior,” spokesman Mike Manko said in an email. “We are asking any woman who believes that they may be a victim to come forward.”

Geary told the victim in the case that he could give her extra benefits through the DPW if she wanted to bring drugs and “party” with him, the complaint said.

He told her he invites women to his home because his wife works nights and his children sleep on the second floor, the complaint said.

The DA’s office asks any potential victims to call 412-388-5300.

Margaret Harding is a staff writer for Trib Total Media. She can be reached at 412-380-8519 or [email protected].

TribLIVE commenting policy

You are solely responsible for your comments and by using you agree to our Terms of Service.

We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.

While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.

We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers

We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.

We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.

We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.

We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.