State Ethics Commission fines lobbyists |

State Ethics Commission fines lobbyists

The State Ethics Commission has fined nine lobbying groups, including two local ones, for missing the deadline for filing their financial reports for the third quarter of 2012.

Myron Arnowitt, state director of Clean Water Action, said the person responsible for filing the report was on leave at the deadline and the organization did not realize it had failed to file until the next quarterly report was due.

“We got it in as soon as we realized it hadn’t been filed,” Arnowitt said.

The environmental advocacy group reported $3,600 in lobbying expenses for the third quarter. Arnowitt said the group rarely spends as much as $5,000 in a three-month period and often doesn’t meet the $2,500 reporting threshold.

“We’re not flying anyone to the Super Bowl or anything like that,” he said.

The commission fined Clean Water Action and five other groups $3,290, or $35 per day, for being 94 days late.

The other groups are American Chemistry Council of Washington; Ahold USA of Quincy, Mass.; CeaseFirePA of Philadelphia; Matrix Development Group of Monroe, N.J.; and Pennsylvania National Guard Associations of Annville.

It fined Synergy Real Estate Corp. of McKeesport $3,220, or $35 per day, for being 92 days late. A representative for the group could not be reached for comment.

The commission fined two groups $750, or $50 per day, for being 15 days late: Astrum Solar Inc. of Annapolis Junction, Md., and National Safety Compliance of Lakewood, N.J.

Brian Bowling is a staff writer for Trib Total Media. He can be reached at 412-325-4301 or [email protected].

TribLIVE commenting policy

You are solely responsible for your comments and by using you agree to our Terms of Service.

We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.

While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.

We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers

We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.

We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.

We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.

We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.