ShareThis Page
State in line for $4 billion highway boost |

State in line for $4 billion highway boost

| Saturday, April 26, 2008 12:00 a.m

Pennsylvania would be a big winner under a congressional transportation spending proposal with bipartisan backing to be released in January after a new president takes office.

The state would receive an extra $4 billion for highway and transit projects starting in late 2009, U.S. Rep. James Oberstar, who chairs the House Transportation Committee, said Friday during a visit to Pittsburgh.

The plan would authorize between $450 billion and $500 billion in spending over six years for all states, he said.

Pennsylvania’s share would increase from $8.3 billion under the current budget to about $12 billion, said Oberstar, a Minnesota Democrat.

“That would be a welcome addition to help pay for our construction needs,” said PennDOT spokesman Rich Kirkpatrick.

U.S. Rep. John Mica of Florida, the committee’s ranking Republican, supports the proposal. The bill, which is being drafted, would face a Senate version before being considered by the next president.

“I think right now, generally speaking, John Mica is on the same page,” said Justin Harclerode, a Republican spokesman on transportation matters. “Mr. Mica will be very interested in exploring creative financing — different ways to take advantage of the private investment potential out there.”

Oberstar would not say how much of a gasoline tax hike he proposes to pay for the increased spending on roads, bridges and mass transit. The 18.4-cent federal tax last was increased by 4.3 cents in 1993.

“What that amount will be, we’ll determine next year,” he said.

The funding plan — called the Safe, Accountable, Flexible, Efficient Transportation Equity Act, or SAFETEA-LU — approved $286 billion in transportation spending through late 2009.

The increase Oberstar seeks would not pay for extra road and bridge projects, said U.S. Rep. Jason Altmire, D-McCandless, a member of the transportation committee.

“That number is just to maintain our current level of infrastructure,” Altmire said.

Federal money is crucial to state and local road programs. Many road projects managed by PennDOT, Allegheny County and municipalities receive up to 80 percent of their money from the federal government. Among them are the recent Homestead Grays Bridge rehabilitation and the upcoming $47 million rehabilitation of the Rankin Bridge.

Categories: News
TribLIVE commenting policy

You are solely responsible for your comments and by using you agree to our Terms of Service.

We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.

While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.

We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers

We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.

We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.

We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.

We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.