ShareThis Page
State police drop charges against 2 |

State police drop charges against 2

| Wednesday, April 11, 2012 12:00 a.m

State police in Kittanning have withdrawn charges against two former Pine supervisors accused of making unauthorized purchases of fuel with township gas cards.

Douglas F. Kennedy, 64, and Richard “Dicky” Myers, 53, both from Templeton, have each been cleared of the charges of theft by deception and of access device fraud.

Attorney Joel S. Sansone, who represented Myers, said Monday his client believed the charges were improperly brought against him. He said Myers is relieved the issue has been resolved and that his name has been cleared.

Attorney Robert Cinpinski, who represented Kennedy, could not be reached for comment, nor could Cpl. Joseph Murphy of the state police in East Franklin who filed the charges.

In January, Myers and Kennedy appeared before District Judge Samuel R. Goldstrohm and agreed to pay restitution to Pine in exchange for the charges being dropped.

Even though both men maintained their innocence, Kennedy agreed to pay $3,804.03. Myers agreed to pay $1,490.54 in addition to state and federal tax on fuel he allegedly purchased in 2004 and 2005 using a Pine gas card totaling $3,987.22.

According to an affidavit, the charges were filed against Myers on Aug. 26 after the alleged unauthorized fuel purchases were discovered by township supervisors and township secretary, Stephanie Reedy. The incidents allegedly took place between Jan. 17 and Nov. 23, 2004. Myers was a Pine supervisor in 2004 and 2005.

Charges were filed against Kennedy, also on Aug. 26, after Reedy and township supervisors said they discovered unauthorized purchases of unleaded gasoline made with a Pine gas card. The discovery was allegedly made in 2008 and the affidavit accused Kennedy of making illegal purchases between Aug. 19, 2005 and Nov. 14, 2007. Kennedy was a Pine supervisor in 2005, 2006 and 2007.

Although charges in this case have been withdrawn, it is unlikely that Myers has had his last day in court with the state police.

In August, Myers filed a federal lawsuit against a number of Armstrong County-based state police troopers who he alleges have violated his civil rights.

Myers filed the suit on Aug. 30 against trooper Brian Shaffer and 11 other troopers, alleging they participated in the use of excessive force against him, charging him with false charges and crimes, charging his son with false charges and crimes and harassing him and his son.

According to the lawsuit, Shaffer began having an affair with Myers’ wife, Jacqueline Myers, around January 2008. When Myers became aware of the affair he contacted Shaffer in November 2009. Since then, the suit alleges that “Shaffer has used his position, power and influence as a Pennsylvania state trooper to harass and otherwise deprive Myers of his constitutional rights. Defendant Shaffer has enlisted the assistance and conspired with the other named defendants in order to carry out this harassment.”

The other troopers named in the lawsuit are Anthony Aulicino, James DePaolo, Thomas Dubovi, Daniel Herr, Randall Kruse, Steve McKillop (listed as McKizzop in the complaint), David Naberezny, Bradley Smail, Thomas Snyder, Samuel Vicari and Brian Wolfe.

Joel Sansone and Scanlon & Sansone are representing Myers in the federal lawsuit.

Categories: News
TribLIVE commenting policy

You are solely responsible for your comments and by using you agree to our Terms of Service.

We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.

While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.

We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers

We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.

We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.

We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.

We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.