State Senate passes bill to lower blood-alcohol limit |

State Senate passes bill to lower blood-alcohol limit

HARRISBURG — A week before a federal deadline, the state Senate passed a bill to lower Pennsylvania’s legal blood-alcohol limit for motorists after a conference committee worked out differences with Pennsylvania’s House of Representatives.

The bill was approved 47-1 without debate. It now goes to the House, which had previously passed a similar bill that ran into opposition in the Senate over the severity of punishments for certain offenders, among other things.

In addition to lowering the blood-alcohol limit from 0.10 percent to 0.08 percent, the bill is a broad revision to the state’s 20-year-old drunken-driving law.

It toughens penalties for drivers with especially high blood-alcohol levels and ensures that the Pennsylvania Department of Transportation has authority to install an ignition interlock device in the car of a repeat offender for one year whether ordered by a judge or not.

“By going to 0.08, people will be more cautious before getting behind the wheel,” said Sen. Charles Dent, R-Lehigh. “We believe behaviors will change in the community.”

Without a 0.08 blood-alcohol limit in force by Oct. 1, the state faces losing up to $11 million in federal transportation dollars, or 2 percent of certain highway construction funds. The federal government also requires states to include an ignition interlock provision in the legislation, which has been part of Pennsylvania law for two years.

The bill sets up different sets of punishments for different blood-alcohol levels — 0.08 to 0.099, 0.10 to 0.159, and 0.16 and up. The punishments become more severe with each offense.

“Having worked on the task force that developed this legislation, I am very pleased that the conference committee endorsed the tiered approach to DUI legislation developed by the State House,” said Rep. Mike Turzai, R-McCandless. “I’m glad the Senate adopted the conference report this afternoon. It will be good to get back here on Monday so the House can also approve the report.”

The bill also contains provisions to help offenders who lose their license to be able to drive sooner, but only for purposes involving their job. For instance, first-time offenders who register a blood alcohol level of 0.10 or more lose their regular license for a year, but have an opportunity to get an occupational license after a 60-day suspension. First-time offenders with a blood-alcohol level beneath 0.10 do not face losing their license.

Pennsylvania is one of the last states to process this legislation. So far, 44 states, the District of Columbia and Puerto Rico have adopted the lower blood-alcohol limit, according to the National Highway Traffic Safety Administration.

TribLIVE commenting policy

You are solely responsible for your comments and by using you agree to our Terms of Service.

We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.

While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.

We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers

We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.

We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.

We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.

We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.