ShareThis Page
State sues used car warranty company |

State sues used car warranty company

| Friday, November 16, 2001 12:00 a.m

The state Attorney General’s Office filed suit Thursday against the operators of a used car warranty company who closed their business while owing $45,000 to customers in Westmoreland County and in Pennsylvania and New York.

Authorities allege that Kevin and Kristen Smith, operators of Northeast Warranty Corp. of Taylor, Lackawanna County, did not offer refunds or pay outstanding claims to more than 70 consumers when they closed their business without prior notice in September 2000.

Officials in the Attorney General’s Office allege the Smiths sold six-month to three-year car repair reimbursement warranties through several used car dealers in Pennsylvania and surrounding states.

Officials said more than 70 customers throughout Pennsylvania and in New York claim they paid between $195 and $395 for repair coverage, and wound up either having the coverage canceled or receiving bills for unpaid claims.

Included in the suit were Pennsylvania customers from Westmoreland, Allegheny, Greene, Lackawanna, Lawrence, Luzerne, Monroe, Wayne and Wyoming counties.

Individual losses ranged from $135 to $3,555. Two auto repair centers also reported losses.

In addition to more than $45,000 in restitution for the 70 customers and others who come forward with proof of losses, the Attorney General’s Office is seeking $7,100 in civil penalties and the forfeiture of the Smiths’ right to engage in warranty business until restitution is arranged, officials said.

The Attorney General’s Office is asking those who suspect they may be eligible for restitution to phone 800-441-2555 or to file a complaint online at .

is a former freelancer.

Categories: News
TribLIVE commenting policy

You are solely responsible for your comments and by using you agree to our Terms of Service.

We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.

While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.

We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers

We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.

We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.

We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.

We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.