ShareThis Page
States, environmental groups delay suit against EPA, watch for climate plan |

States, environmental groups delay suit against EPA, watch for climate plan

| Monday, June 17, 2013 8:12 p.m

WASHINGTON — Environmental groups and a dozen states and cities said Monday they will delay planned legal action against the Environmental Protection Agency, saying they will wait to see if the White House soon presents a climate policy strategy.

The attorneys general of New York and nine other states, along with three major green groups, had planned to sue the EPA this week because it missed a deadline in April to finalize emissions standards for new electric power plants.

Two months after notifying the agency they intended to sue, the consortium had expected to file as early as Monday, but backed off to allow the White House to disclose its climate plans.

Melissa Grace, a spokeswoman for New York Attorney General Eric Schneiderman, said the lawsuit would be postponed “for a short period” because of reports of an announcement.

President Obama reportedly told campaign donors last week he will present a package of measures to combat climate change, possibly including EPA curbs on power plant emissions.

Many of those donors are ardent opponents of TransCanada Corp’s planned Keystone XL pipeline, which would carry oil produced in Canada’s oil sands regions to refineries on the U.S. Gulf Coast. Some policy analysts reason that, if Obama approves the pipeline, he will face pressure to announce strong climate measures to offset the move.

The Natural Resources Defense Council, one of the groups that planned to sue, said that Obama should advance his previous pledges.

“The president has set a goal to cut our carbon emissions by 17 percent — from our 2005 levels — by 2020. We need a set of actions that will get us there,” said David Hawkins, director of climate programs at the environmental group.

Categories: News
TribLIVE commenting policy

You are solely responsible for your comments and by using you agree to our Terms of Service.

We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.

While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.

We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers

We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.

We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.

We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.

We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.